Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: SLS vs Sodium Coco-Sulfate

  1. #11
    Limited Edition Konstifik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the borderlands of the arctic circle
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,195
    Length
    48 cm/86 cm/100+
    Type
    1c/2a/F/i/ii

    Default Re: SLS vs Sodium Coco-Sulfate

    Quote Originally Posted by teela1978 View Post
    Hmmm.... If your scalp easily turns into a desert, I would tend to think that something called 'squeaky green' would not be the best thing to wash your hair with. Maybe you could find a more moisturizing shampoo?
    I've tried my best, but haven't found The shampoo yet. However, I CO wash and only clarify with shampoo maybe once a week, so it's not a terrible strain on my hair or scalp.

    Here's the ingedient list for Squeaky Green:

    Sodium Coco-Sulfate, Perfume, Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), Nettle (Urtica Dioica), Water (Aqua), Tea Tree Powder (Melaleuca Alternifolia), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), Rose Absolute (Rosa centifolia), Chamomile Blue Oil (Matricaria Chamomilla), Vanilla Absolute (Vanilla planifolia), Coumarin, *Geraniol, *Benzyl Benzoate, *Limonene, *Linalool, Hydroxycitronellol, Chlorophyllin.

  2. #12
    Member Almeda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    France
    Age
    40
    Posts
    104
    Length
    24,8/28/35
    Type
    1b/M/i

    Default Re: SLS vs Sodium Coco-Sulfate

    Just for your information :
    Lush has changed its formula.

    Now, all their solid shampoo have a SLS basis. Even Squeaky Green

  3. #13
    Limited Edition Konstifik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the borderlands of the arctic circle
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,195
    Length
    48 cm/86 cm/100+
    Type
    1c/2a/F/i/ii

    Default Re: SLS vs Sodium Coco-Sulfate

    Quote Originally Posted by Almeda View Post
    Just for your information :
    Lush has changed its formula.

    Now, all their solid shampoo have a SLS basis. Even Squeaky Green
    Aww... What a shame! Oh well, thanks for telling.

  4. #14
    Member Almeda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    France
    Age
    40
    Posts
    104
    Length
    24,8/28/35
    Type
    1b/M/i

    Default Re: SLS vs Sodium Coco-Sulfate

    You're welcome
    The basis changed in december 2008/january 2009.

    But all lush shampoos are made without silicone.
    And the solid shampoo do not contain parabens

  5. #15
    Member Fractalsofhair's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    3,291
    Length
    15.5?/Shldr/30-34
    Type
    1b/1c/F/iii

    Default Re: SLS vs Sodium Coco-Sulfate

    Check out Burt's Bees for a "cheap" SLS free shampoo. Super shiny is a bit drying, but less so than SLS, and will still remove cones.

    If you don't use cones, shampoo bars or CO washing would be the way to go. Shampoo bars are very mild.

  6. #16
    Limited Edition Konstifik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the borderlands of the arctic circle
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,195
    Length
    48 cm/86 cm/100+
    Type
    1c/2a/F/i/ii

    Default Re: SLS vs Sodium Coco-Sulfate

    Quote Originally Posted by Fractalsofhair View Post
    Check out Burt's Bees for a "cheap" SLS free shampoo. Super shiny is a bit drying, but less so than SLS, and will still remove cones.

    If you don't use cones, shampoo bars or CO washing would be the way to go. Shampoo bars are very mild.
    Thanks for the tip, they seemed nice. Will check it a bit closer when my current shampoo is running out. I'm cone-free, CO with occasional CWC.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •